You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Most writers of fiction do not earn enough money to live from their writing.
Do you think the government should give them financial assistance to help encourage good literature?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
There are some conditions under which a novelist could reasonably expect some government support. In general, terms, if the writer has already proved that he or she can write well, and if the stories produced are stimulating and interesting, then I consider that some financial help might be given.
Language quality is difficult to define, but if the writing shows, for example, good grammar, a wide vocabulary, and elegance and imagination, then I can see a valid reason for assisting an author to spend some time free from money problems. Such a writer needs to be encouraged. the entertainment value of a book would be also a factor in deciding whether to provide assistance to an author. Further consideration would include social and educational values expressed in the author’s work.
However, if the ideas were socially irresponsible, or if the stories contain unnecessary violence or pornography for their own sake, then I would not want to see the author sponsored to write stories that do not benefit society. Other exceptions are the many writers of good books who do not require financial help. Books that proved to be extremely popular, such as the Harry Potter stories, clearly need no subsidy at all because the authors have become rich through their writing.
Views on what good quality writing means will vary widely, and so if any author is to be given money for writing, then the decision would have to be made by a committee or panel of judges. An individual opinion would certainly cause disagreement among the reading public.